What interesting times we live in. Not since the late 1980s and early 1990s have I seen so many new and cool mountain bikes and components. Back in “the day” (80s/early90s), the industry and product category were replete with artisan builders of both frames and components. We saw so many notable (and not so notable) developments back then. Does anyone remember U Brakes, Shimano BioPace chainrings and Slingshot frames, to name a few?
Then came the late 1990s and 2000s. This seemed like the era of standardization and commoditization. The norms were 3×8 and 3×9 drivetrains, thumb index shifters, 26 inch wheels and mass-produced bikes from Taiwan. This was a relatively boring era in mountain biking, and there were years that I almost lost interest, opting to ride singletrack on my KTM instead.
Then, boom! Here we are in the 2010 to present era. All of a sudden, I feel like we are in another renaissance period, with several new and cool platforms becoming standard fare – even on moderately priced bikes. I’m sure there are many more, but here are a few developments that are on my radar:
- Wheel sizes – After what seemed like decades of rolling on 26 inch wheels, 29 inch wheels are now mainstream for cross country and trail. They just work, especially in areas with a lot of rocks and trail debris. Just in the last year or so, another platform is resurfacing and becoming viable: 27.5/650b. We are seeing some of the major players rolling out 27.5 bikes – for example, check out Santa Cruz’s 5010 (Solo) and Bronson.
- Drive trains – After years of running three chainrings up front, we saw the introduction of 2X10 drivetrains. This is a much improved drivetrain (over 3X9) in my opinion, and you can get a pretty wide range of gearing with an 11-36 cassette in the rear. Next, SRAM drops their XX1 1X11 drivetrain. Look ma, no front derailleur! While I haven’t tried this system yet, I look forward to giving it a go and seeing if I have the leg strength to pedal up the local hills.
- Fat bikes – One of the first outfits to go mainstream with fat bikes was Surly. Now they have several models to choose from, including the Pugsley, Krampus and Moonlander to name a few. In 2013, we saw new offerings from mainstream outfits Trek and Specialized. This is a category where, like the late 1980s, we are seeing some boutique and artisan brands (for example, Colorado Springs’ own Borealis Bikes). Hopefully, all this excitement will confirm “fat bikes” as a viable category – we’ll see.
The last few years have also seen many other “refinements.” Carbon is becoming more mainstream as a frame material, and you no longer have to drop $10k to get a carbon bike. Stan’s NoTubes is a lifesaver in cactus and thorn-infested areas. And how about some new full-suspension categories such as “all-mountain” and “enduro.”
Yes, we are living in interesting times in mountain biking. My only regret? I wish I was a little younger so I could ride these new toys like I did as a young pup. But as they say, being old is better than the alternative….
Smuenz says
Lynn. Nice blog! Those slingshot bikes were built in Grand Rapids. My brother John sold for them. Gruendale (sp) brothers built the bikes. We spent some scary nights in an old warehouse in downtown GR! It was capturing to watch it all come together. I still have a Slingshot tri bike. Turns heads!
Lynn Kehler says
Very cool, Steve. I didn’t know Slingshot was from Grand Rapids. I have a buddy here in COS that bought one recently – they do turn heads with the missing down tube!
Craig says
Howdie Steve,
I enjoyed your bike review. So many are generic in nature from somebody who has only rode the bike once or twice. So the root of my question involves you actually owning a 5010 and being able to speak to your history/knowledge there of. So….two questions really….did you struggle with the whole 5010/Bronson question are just know? I like you am a spec away from clicking 50….and only have a history of old school hard tails. So many seem to be of the opinion that the bronson and 5010 ride so simalarly go with the larger suspension so you will never wish you had more…then there’s the flip side…why get all that suspension if you don’t need it. I am hoping to demo both and see if there is a revelation to me in the process. On paper I am torn…both are beautiful and I cannot be aboard one or the other.
My other question….did you ever consider a Pivot in the mix or just go straight SC? My guess is Pivot will update the Mach 5 next year and SC may update both the 5010 and Bronson….they should all be right about perfect and could not miss with any of the them….just wondering if you felt a difference in the DW vs the VPP if you compared these and if anything swayed you to the easy decision.
Thanks
Craig
Lynn Kehler says
Hey Craig….did you intend to address your comment to Steve or to me (Lynn)? Hopefully, Steve will chime in.
Thanks….let me know!
Lynn
Steven Muenzenmeyer says
This is all you Lynn!! Have a great day.
Steve